Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 14:09 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
38.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 575ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (153ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (896ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
153ms
DNS 53ms · TLS 48ms
United Stated - New York
271ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 130ms
Spain - Madrid
701ms
DNS 34ms · TLS 331ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
654ms
DNS 22ms · TLS 314ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
896ms
DNS 224ms · TLS 332ms
Singapore - Singapore
775ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 383ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 575ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)

Missing <html lang> attribute -- screen readers default to the user's system language and pronounce content with the wrong phonetics.

Accessibility › Document Language
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$650 investment → $3,813/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$650
6.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$3,813
$45,752/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6939% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.2 mo payback · +7220% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$50 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~14%.

Barriers
6
6 warn
Bounce delta
+14pp
added vs baseline
Score
82
B
Speed
0
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$650 6.5 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$50 3 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$16,938 / month at risk ~$203,252 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Heading level skipped: H1 → H3 (missing H2)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$3,813 /mo

+14.2pp bounce · ~1,417 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.03 /mo

407.4 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~41 KB per page load
    Saves $0.03/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
76
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
91
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

832 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.51 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.13 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.51 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
91
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

230 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

331 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

294 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

331 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 80.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3769 peers
You 83
·
Avg 73
+10 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Performance P97Security P96Accessibility P91Sustainability P85Infrastructure P23Content P32SEO P41

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
Microsoft 365 · 2393 peers
You 83
·
Avg 72
+11 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Performance P99Security P97Accessibility P93Sustainability P91Infrastructure P26Content P33SEO P41

Top 10% of Microsoft 365 sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of Microsoft 365 sites See full Microsoft 365 benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

5 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console Microsoft 365
Server
Apache
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server GoDaddy

All Detected Technologies (5)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence NS record: ns23.domaincontrol.com
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=MDxc1wykl2NB0DcxvLzGIsIz3tbAjRGOabdYycXT3ZA
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: southwesthomeandhearth-com.mail.protection.outlook.com

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsouthwesthomeandhearth.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/fac4366a-84ea-4b2d-86c4-bc08cd1915bb)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/fac4366a-84ea-4b2d-86c4-bc08cd1915bb"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsouthwesthomeandhearth.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsouthwesthomeandhearth.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → B (88)
  • · Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback