Skip to content
Scanned
2026-10-15 11:29 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
44.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 416ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (165ms), slowest from Singapore (924ms). Google Cloud CDN in front. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
526ms
DNS 166ms · TLS 128ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
170ms
DNS 31ms · TLS 17ms
United States - Santa Clara
165ms
DNS 77ms · TLS 21ms
United Stated - New York
187ms
DNS 34ms · TLS 22ms
Spain - Madrid
525ms
DNS 29ms · TLS 27ms
Singapore - Singapore
924ms
DNS 51ms · TLS 13ms
CDN: Google Cloud CDN · Avg TTFB: 416ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

hstspreload.org fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

2 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 4

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
Warning: 5

3 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. The 1 performance issue below shapes how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
1 performance issue — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$633 investment → $3,813/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$633
6.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$3,813
$45,752/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+7124% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$417 → 0.1 mo payback · +10880% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$33 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~14%.

Barriers
5
5 warn
Bounce delta
+14pp
added vs baseline
Score
85
A
Speed
0
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
1
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 2 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$633 6.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$33 2 fixes in ~20 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$3,813 / month at risk ~$45,752 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$3,813 /mo

+14.2pp bounce · ~1,417 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.00 /mo

58.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~6 KB per page load
    Saves $0.00/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
90
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.11 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.11 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.50 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.11 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
90
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

417 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

417 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

596 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

417 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 82.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Domains · 238 peers
You 84
·
Avg 75
+9 above average
0 50 100
Better than 97% of Google Domains sites See full Google Domains benchmark →
HSTS · 3294 peers
You 84
·
Avg 78
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P4Performance P89Infrastructure P17Security P80Sustainability P80Accessibility P71Content P30SEO P49

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 79% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Domains, hosted on Google Cloud, with Google Cloud CDN CDN

4 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Domains HSTS
CDN
Google Cloud CDN
Hosting
Google Cloud

All Detected Technologies (4)

Cloud CDN uses Google's global edge network to serve content closer to users.

Categories CDN Website https://cloud.google.com/cdn Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence via: 1.1 google

Google Cloud is a suite of cloud computing services.

Categories IaaS Website https://cloud.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Via header contains google
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-cloud-e4.googledomains.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Domains) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhstspreload.org)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/hstspreload.org)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/hstspreload.org"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhstspreload.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhstspreload.org

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (87)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · No H1 heading found

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 6h → A (92)
  • · 2 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · 3 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback