Skip to content
https://techydonut.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-10-31 05:28 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
33.00s
Vs prev
—

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

techydonut.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 2

7 third-party resources (46% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 3

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

External script from claritasanalytics.com lacks integrity attribute

External resource without SRI — if the third-party CDN is compromised, your site executes attacker-controlled code.

Security › Subresource Integrity
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your page blocks user input for 328ms — visitors may think the site is frozen. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your audience reach.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
1 performance issue — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$225 investment → $4,961/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$225
2.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$4,961
$59,530/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+26358% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$175 → 0.0 mo payback · +33917% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$125 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~14%.

Barriers
4
1 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+14pp
added vs baseline
Score
81
B
Speed
1
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • 11 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 328ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$225 2.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$125 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$4,961 / month at risk ~$59,530 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • 7 of 7 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$4,961 /mo

+14.2pp bounce · ~1,417 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 3.50

Bandwidth Waste

$0.10 /mo

1236.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~124 KB per page load
    Saves $0.10/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

92
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.03 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.03 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

328 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.048

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.21 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.42 s

Desktop

77
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

321 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

675 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.618

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

454 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

675 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 86.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 4610 peers
You 86
·
Avg 75
+11 above average
0 50 100
Performance P89SEO P87Sustainability P86Accessibility P85Security P83Content P72Compliance P35Infrastructure P61

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 90% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 3637 peers
You 86
·
Avg 78
+8 above average
0 50 100
SEO P85Performance P79Sustainability P79Security P71Accessibility P71Content P71Compliance P40Infrastructure P56

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 82% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, on PHP, with Hostinger CDN CDN

8 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Hostinger
Framework
Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph Priority Hints
Runtime
PHP 8.5.12
CDN
Hostinger CDN

All Detected Technologies (8)

Hostinger Content Delivery Network (CDN).

Categories CDN Website https://www.hostinger.com Detected by BeaverCheck

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-powered-by: PHP/8.5.12
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=mBt1aBzz_IQU3OwyW65BNRYJtYx_zmVutnR_CqNihq0

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Hostinger is an employee-owned Web hosting provider and internet domain registrar.

Categories Hosting Website https://www.hostinger.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (3)

Runtime exposed via X-Powered-By header

The X-Powered-By header reveals 'PHP 8.5.12'. Remove this header in production to reduce information leakage.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechydonut.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/techydonut.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/techydonut.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechydonut.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechydonut.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 2h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → A (91)
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 7 third-party resources (46% of weight)
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing
  • · External script from claritasanalytics.com lacks integrity attribute

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → A (91)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback