Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Excellent global latency — average 57ms across 6 locations, fastest from Sao Paulo (22ms), slowest from Madrid (101ms). Cloudflare in front. Cache-Control header is missing.
Audit overview
All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
Scan returned a Cloudflare bot-protection interstitial, not the actual page
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
No favicon or icon links detected
Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.
1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
11 third-party resources (83% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$900 investment → $8,080/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.
- Page feels frozen for 1.5sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- Page loads in 3.1sEvery additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 579ms over→ Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$150,000
- No <nav> landmark foundADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
$6,990 /mo
+26.0pp bounce · ~2,598 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$0.13 /mo
1672.3 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~167 KB per page loadSaves $0.13/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
934 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.08 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.46 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.003
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.07 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
3.92 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
255 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
838 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
94 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
437 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
954 ms
Categories
8Performance
1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
No favicon or icon links detected
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of AngularJS sites score 82+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Cloudflare Turnstile sites score 82+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
AngularJS, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
AngularJS 
Cloudflare Turnstile Google Search Console HSTS 
HTTP/3 Microsoft Microsoft 365 Mimecast Cloudflare All Detected Technologies (9)
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
AngularJS is a JavaScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.
Turnstile is Cloudflare's smart CAPTCHA alternative.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (AngularJS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/fef94dd8-a6b6-4398-800e-3edfec52abfd)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/fef94dd8-a6b6-4398-800e-3edfec52abfd"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FQuality.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FQuality.orgExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 9h total → projected A (91)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Scan returned a Cloudflare bot-protection interstitial, not the actual page
- · No favicon or icon links detected
- · 11 third-party resources (83% of weight)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+1Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source