Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
67
TTFB stable →
707ms
FCP stable →
2.2s
LCP stable →
5.9s
Scanned
2026-07-10 10:59 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
57.00s
Vs prev
Declined by -1

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 563ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (140ms), slowest from Singapore (1169ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
707ms
DNS 272ms · TLS 149ms
United Stated - New York
140ms
DNS 45ms · TLS 25ms
Spain - Madrid
541ms
DNS 127ms · TLS 116ms
United States - Santa Clara
266ms
DNS 105ms · TLS 48ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
558ms
DNS 196ms · TLS 103ms
Singapore - Singapore
1169ms
DNS 449ms · TLS 228ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 563ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

6 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.

Security › Source Map Exposure
Critical: 2

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 4

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 5

2 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$725 investment → $12,294/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$725
7.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$12,294
$147,527/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+20249% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$3750.0 mo payback · +39241% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$125 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
9
1 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
66
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 5.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 376ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$725 7.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$125 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$7,859 / month at risk ~$94,307 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,859 /mo

+29.2pp bounce · ~2,921 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.16 /mo

1965.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~197 KB per page load
    Saves $0.16/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

67
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
63
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.20 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.89 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

376 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.027

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.03 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.89 s

Desktop

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
66
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.04 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.43 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

18 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.48 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.43 s

Categories

8
Avg score 77.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 903 peers
You 78
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Infrastructure P10Performance P88Security P88Content P17Sustainability P79Accessibility P66SEO P64

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 65 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 82% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Font Awesome · 575 peers
You 78
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Performance P92Infrastructure P9Security P86Content P16Sustainability P82SEO P71Accessibility P65

Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 65 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 83% of Font Awesome sites See full Font Awesome benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 3.1.0, on PHP, with cdnjs CDN

11 technologies detected 4 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Bootstrap 3.1.0 Font Awesome HTTP/3 Ionicons Morris.js Raphael 2.1.0 jQuery 1.10.2
Runtime
PHP
CDN
cdnjs

All Detected Technologies (11)

Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains cdnjs.cloudflare.com: https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/raphael/2.1.0/raphael-min.js

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.1.0/js/bootstrap.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Ionicons is an open-source icon set crafted for web, iOS, Android, and desktop apps.

Categories Font scripts Website https://ionicons.com Detected by BeaverCheck

A JavaScript library that simplifies the process of creating interactive and responsive data visualizations on the web.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://morrisjs.github.io/morris.js/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Raphael is a cross-browser JavaScript library that draws Vector graphics for websites.

Categories JavaScript graphics Website https://dmitrybaranovskiy.github.io/raphael/ Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js, Script URL: https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.10.2.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google-analytics.com: //www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-VYMKBH7R3V&cx=c&_slc=1

Observations (4)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Bootstrap version may be outdated

Detected Bootstrap 3.1.0. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 1.10.2. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Felvalordemiweb.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/ff780c33-5566-4c23-82ef-72c6b2978a3f)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/ff780c33-5566-4c23-82ef-72c6b2978a3f"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Felvalordemiweb.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Felvalordemiweb.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 6 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)
  • · 2 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (86)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback