| Metric | 1C-Bitrix | Arc XP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 57 | 24 | 1C-Bitrix |
| Accessibility | 82 | 85 | Arc XP |
| Best Practices | 98 | 79 | 1C-Bitrix |
| SEO | 85 | 90 | Arc XP |
| Security | 73 | 62 | 1C-Bitrix |
| TTFB | 1068ms | 303ms | Arc XP |
| Composite | 74 | 70 | 1C-Bitrix |
1C-Bitrix outperforms Arc XP in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 70). Arc XP leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.
Choose 1C-Bitrix when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Arc XP when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited 1C-Bitrix sites and 29 audited Arc XP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback