| Metric | 1C-Bitrix | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 57 | 36 | 1C-Bitrix |
| Accessibility | 82 | 88 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 98 | 84 | 1C-Bitrix |
| SEO | 85 | 91 | core-js |
| Security | 73 | 65 | 1C-Bitrix |
| TTFB | 1068ms | 374ms | core-js |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | 1C-Bitrix |
1C-Bitrix outperforms core-js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). core-js leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.
Choose 1C-Bitrix when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited 1C-Bitrix sites and 1582 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback