Skip to content

1C-Bitrix vs Gannett CMS

Based on 3 and 7 real audits

View 1C-Bitrix details | View Gannett CMS details
Metric1C-BitrixGannett CMSWinner
Performance57501C-Bitrix
Accessibility8287Gannett CMS
Best Practices98931C-Bitrix
SEO85511C-Bitrix
Security73701C-Bitrix
TTFB1068ms117msGannett CMS
Composite74731C-Bitrix
Performance
1C-Bitrix
57
Gannett CMS
50
Accessibility
1C-Bitrix
82
Gannett CMS
87
Security
1C-Bitrix
73
Gannett CMS
70
SEO
1C-Bitrix
85
Gannett CMS
51
Composite
1C-Bitrix
74
Gannett CMS
73

1C-Bitrix outperforms Gannett CMS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Gannett CMS leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose 1C-Bitrix

Choose 1C-Bitrix when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Gannett CMS

Choose Gannett CMS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited 1C-Bitrix sites and 7 audited Gannett CMS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, 1C-Bitrix or Gannett CMS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, 1C-Bitrix sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (57 vs 50 on average).
Which has better security, 1C-Bitrix or Gannett CMS?
1C-Bitrix sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, 1C-Bitrix or Gannett CMS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Gannett CMS (87 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, 1C-Bitrix or Gannett CMS?
1C-Bitrix sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (85 vs 51 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), 1C-Bitrix or Gannett CMS?
Gannett CMS sites show lower Time to First Byte (117 ms vs 1068 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose 1C-Bitrix or Gannett CMS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. 1C-Bitrix scores higher on overall composite score while 1C-Bitrix may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback