Skip to content

1C-Bitrix vs Ghost

Based on 3 and 3 real audits

View 1C-Bitrix details | View Ghost details
Metric1C-BitrixGhostWinner
Performance5757Tie
Accessibility8294Ghost
Best Practices98921C-Bitrix
SEO8592Ghost
Security73601C-Bitrix
TTFB1068ms277msGhost
Composite7475Ghost
Performance
1C-Bitrix
57
Ghost
57
Accessibility
1C-Bitrix
82
Ghost
94
Security
1C-Bitrix
73
Ghost
60
SEO
1C-Bitrix
85
Ghost
92
Composite
1C-Bitrix
74
Ghost
75

Ghost outperforms 1C-Bitrix in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). 1C-Bitrix leads in best practices, security.

When to choose 1C-Bitrix

Choose 1C-Bitrix when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Ghost

Choose Ghost when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited 1C-Bitrix sites and 3 audited Ghost sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, 1C-Bitrix or Ghost?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, 1C-Bitrix sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (57 vs 57 on average).
Which has better security, 1C-Bitrix or Ghost?
1C-Bitrix sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, 1C-Bitrix or Ghost?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Ghost (94 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, 1C-Bitrix or Ghost?
Ghost sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), 1C-Bitrix or Ghost?
Ghost sites show lower Time to First Byte (277 ms vs 1068 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose 1C-Bitrix or Ghost for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. 1C-Bitrix scores higher on overall composite score while 1C-Bitrix may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback