Skip to content

33Across vs Criteo

Based on 14 and 111 real audits

View 33Across details | View Criteo details
Metric33AcrossCriteoWinner
Performance2929Tie
Accessibility868433Across
Best Practices777633Across
SEO9090Tie
Security666433Across
TTFB311ms296msCriteo
Composite727033Across
Performance
33Across
29
Criteo
29
Accessibility
33Across
86
Criteo
84
Security
33Across
66
Criteo
64
SEO
33Across
90
Criteo
90
Composite
33Across
72
Criteo
70

33Across outperforms Criteo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Criteo leads in TTFB.

When to choose 33Across

Choose 33Across when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Criteo

Choose Criteo when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 14 audited 33Across sites and 111 audited Criteo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, 33Across or Criteo?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, 33Across sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (29 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, 33Across or Criteo?
33Across sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, 33Across or Criteo?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor 33Across (86 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, 33Across or Criteo?
33Across sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), 33Across or Criteo?
Criteo sites show lower Time to First Byte (296 ms vs 311 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose 33Across or Criteo for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. 33Across scores higher on overall composite score while 33Across may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback