Skip to content

33Across vs DoubleClick Floodlight

Based on 14 and 594 real audits

View 33Across details | View DoubleClick Floodlight details
Metric33AcrossDoubleClick FloodlightWinner
Performance2932DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8687DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices7781DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9091DoubleClick Floodlight
Security666433Across
TTFB311ms340ms33Across
Composite7272Tie
Performance
33Across
29
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Accessibility
33Across
86
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Security
33Across
66
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
SEO
33Across
90
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Composite
33Across
72
DoubleClick Floodlight
72

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms 33Across in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). 33Across leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose 33Across

Choose 33Across when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 14 audited 33Across sites and 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, 33Across or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, 33Across or DoubleClick Floodlight?
33Across sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, 33Across or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, 33Across or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), 33Across or DoubleClick Floodlight?
33Across sites show lower Time to First Byte (311 ms vs 340 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose 33Across or DoubleClick Floodlight for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while 33Across may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback