| Metric | 8x8 | Facebook Pixel | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 33 | 8x8 |
| Accessibility | 56 | 88 | Facebook Pixel |
| Best Practices | 77 | 79 | Facebook Pixel |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | 8x8 |
| Security | 79 | 65 | 8x8 |
| TTFB | 866ms | 392ms | Facebook Pixel |
| Composite | 79 | 72 | 8x8 |
8x8 outperforms Facebook Pixel in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 72). Facebook Pixel leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.
Choose 8x8 when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook Pixel when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited 8x8 sites and 602 audited Facebook Pixel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback