| Metric | 8x8 | Facebook Pixel | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 33 | 8x8 |
| Accessibility | 56 | 88 | Facebook Pixel |
| Best Practices | 77 | 79 | Facebook Pixel |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 79 | 66 | 8x8 |
| TTFB | 866ms | 422ms | Facebook Pixel |
| Composite | 79 | 72 | 8x8 |
8x8 and Facebook Pixel are closely matched, each leading in different categories. 8x8 has a composite score of 79 while Facebook Pixel scores 72.
Choose 8x8 when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook Pixel when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited 8x8 sites and 636 audited Facebook Pixel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback