Skip to content

AB Tasty vs HSTS

Based on 28 and 2556 real audits

View AB Tasty details | View HSTS details
MetricAB TastyHSTSWinner
Performance3249HSTS
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8588HSTS
SEO9191Tie
Security6570HSTS
TTFB325ms364msAB Tasty
Composite7275HSTS
Performance
AB Tasty
32
HSTS
49
Accessibility
AB Tasty
89
HSTS
89
Security
AB Tasty
65
HSTS
70
SEO
AB Tasty
91
HSTS
91
Composite
AB Tasty
72
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms AB Tasty in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). AB Tasty leads in TTFB.

When to choose AB Tasty

Choose AB Tasty when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 28 audited AB Tasty sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AB Tasty or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, AB Tasty or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AB Tasty or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AB Tasty (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AB Tasty or HSTS?
AB Tasty sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AB Tasty or HSTS?
AB Tasty sites show lower Time to First Byte (325 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AB Tasty or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while AB Tasty may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback