Based on 3 and 1 real audits
| Metric | ABLyft | Site Search 360 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 54 | 54 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 90 | 71 | ABLyft |
| Best Practices | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| SEO | 89 | 85 | ABLyft |
| Security | 74 | 61 | ABLyft |
| TTFB | 126ms | 166ms | ABLyft |
| Composite | 78 | 73 | ABLyft |
ABLyft outperforms Site Search 360 in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Site Search 360 leads in no categories.
Choose ABLyft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Site Search 360 doesn't clearly lead ABLyft in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 3 audited ABLyft sites and 1 audited Site Search 360 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback