Based on 1 and 11 real audits
| Metric | Accentuate Custom Fields | Afterpay | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2 | 20 | Afterpay |
| Accessibility | 72 | 83 | Afterpay |
| Best Practices | 77 | 82 | Afterpay |
| SEO | 85 | 91 | Afterpay |
| Security | 70 | 69 | Accentuate Custom Fields |
| TTFB | 185ms | 240ms | Accentuate Custom Fields |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | Accentuate Custom Fields |
Afterpay outperforms Accentuate Custom Fields in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 72). Accentuate Custom Fields leads in security, TTFB, composite score.
Choose Accentuate Custom Fields when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Afterpay when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Accentuate Custom Fields sites and 11 audited Afterpay sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback