Skip to content

AccessiBe vs AccessiWay

Based on 25 and 2 real audits

View AccessiBe details | View AccessiWay details
MetricAccessiBeAccessiWayWinner
Performance3525AccessiBe
Accessibility8783AccessiBe
Best Practices8565AccessiBe
SEO9184AccessiBe
Security7080AccessiWay
TTFB233ms151msAccessiWay
Composite7478AccessiWay
Performance
AccessiBe
35
AccessiWay
25
Accessibility
AccessiBe
87
AccessiWay
83
Security
AccessiBe
70
AccessiWay
80
SEO
AccessiBe
91
AccessiWay
84
Composite
AccessiBe
74
AccessiWay
78

AccessiBe outperforms AccessiWay in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 78). AccessiWay leads in security, TTFB, composite score.

When to choose AccessiBe

Choose AccessiBe when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose AccessiWay

Choose AccessiWay when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 25 audited AccessiBe sites and 2 audited AccessiWay sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AccessiBe or AccessiWay?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AccessiBe sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (35 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, AccessiBe or AccessiWay?
AccessiWay sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AccessiBe or AccessiWay?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AccessiBe (87 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AccessiBe or AccessiWay?
AccessiBe sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AccessiBe or AccessiWay?
AccessiWay sites show lower Time to First Byte (151 ms vs 233 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AccessiBe or AccessiWay for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AccessiBe scores higher on overall composite score while AccessiBe may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback