Skip to content

AccessiBe vs Beae

Based on 31 and 2 real audits

View AccessiBe details | View Beae details
MetricAccessiBeBeaeWinner
Performance3328AccessiBe
Accessibility8795Beae
Best Practices8573AccessiBe
SEO91100Beae
Security7280Beae
TTFB278ms744msAccessiBe
Composite7579Beae
Performance
AccessiBe
33
Beae
28
Accessibility
AccessiBe
87
Beae
95
Security
AccessiBe
72
Beae
80
SEO
AccessiBe
91
Beae
100
Composite
AccessiBe
75
Beae
79

Beae outperforms AccessiBe in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 75). AccessiBe leads in performance, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose AccessiBe

Choose AccessiBe when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Beae

Choose Beae when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 31 audited AccessiBe sites and 2 audited Beae sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AccessiBe or Beae?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AccessiBe sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (33 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, AccessiBe or Beae?
Beae sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 72 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AccessiBe or Beae?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Beae (95 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AccessiBe or Beae?
Beae sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AccessiBe or Beae?
AccessiBe sites show lower Time to First Byte (278 ms vs 744 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AccessiBe or Beae for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AccessiBe scores higher on overall composite score while AccessiBe may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback