Skip to content

AccessiBe vs Google Analytics

Based on 25 and 2160 real audits

View AccessiBe details | View Google Analytics details
MetricAccessiBeGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance3542Google Analytics
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices8586Google Analytics
SEO9191Tie
Security7066AccessiBe
TTFB233ms434msAccessiBe
Composite7474Tie
Performance
AccessiBe
35
Google Analytics
42
Accessibility
AccessiBe
87
Google Analytics
87
Security
AccessiBe
70
Google Analytics
66
SEO
AccessiBe
91
Google Analytics
91
Composite
AccessiBe
74
Google Analytics
74

AccessiBe and Google Analytics are closely matched, each leading in different categories. AccessiBe has a composite score of 74 while Google Analytics scores 74.

When to choose AccessiBe

Choose AccessiBe when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 25 audited AccessiBe sites and 2160 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AccessiBe or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, AccessiBe or Google Analytics?
AccessiBe sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AccessiBe or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AccessiBe (87 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AccessiBe or Google Analytics?
AccessiBe sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AccessiBe or Google Analytics?
AccessiBe sites show lower Time to First Byte (233 ms vs 434 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AccessiBe or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while AccessiBe may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback