Skip to content

AccessiBe vs HSTS

Based on 21 and 2556 real audits

View AccessiBe details | View HSTS details
MetricAccessiBeHSTSWinner
Performance3649HSTS
Accessibility8789HSTS
Best Practices8688HSTS
SEO9191Tie
Security6870HSTS
TTFB230ms364msAccessiBe
Composite7375HSTS
Performance
AccessiBe
36
HSTS
49
Accessibility
AccessiBe
87
HSTS
89
Security
AccessiBe
68
HSTS
70
SEO
AccessiBe
91
HSTS
91
Composite
AccessiBe
73
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms AccessiBe in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). AccessiBe leads in TTFB.

When to choose AccessiBe

Choose AccessiBe when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 21 audited AccessiBe sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AccessiBe or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, AccessiBe or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AccessiBe or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AccessiBe or HSTS?
AccessiBe sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AccessiBe or HSTS?
AccessiBe sites show lower Time to First Byte (230 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AccessiBe or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while AccessiBe may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback