Skip to content

AccessiBe vs Revy

Based on 31 and 2 real audits

View AccessiBe details | View Revy details
MetricAccessiBeRevyWinner
Performance3328AccessiBe
Accessibility8795Revy
Best Practices8573AccessiBe
SEO91100Revy
Security7280Revy
TTFB278ms744msAccessiBe
Composite7579Revy
Performance
AccessiBe
33
Revy
28
Accessibility
AccessiBe
87
Revy
95
Security
AccessiBe
72
Revy
80
SEO
AccessiBe
91
Revy
100
Composite
AccessiBe
75
Revy
79

Revy outperforms AccessiBe in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 75). AccessiBe leads in performance, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose AccessiBe

Choose AccessiBe when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Revy

Choose Revy when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 31 audited AccessiBe sites and 2 audited Revy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AccessiBe or Revy?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AccessiBe sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (33 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, AccessiBe or Revy?
Revy sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 72 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AccessiBe or Revy?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Revy (95 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AccessiBe or Revy?
Revy sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AccessiBe or Revy?
AccessiBe sites show lower Time to First Byte (278 ms vs 744 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AccessiBe or Revy for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AccessiBe scores higher on overall composite score while AccessiBe may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback