Skip to content

AccessiWay vs Google Analytics

Based on 2 and 2086 real audits

View AccessiWay details | View Google Analytics details
MetricAccessiWayGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance2542Google Analytics
Accessibility8387Google Analytics
Best Practices6586Google Analytics
SEO8491Google Analytics
Security8066AccessiWay
TTFB151ms421msAccessiWay
Composite7873AccessiWay
Performance
AccessiWay
25
Google Analytics
42
Accessibility
AccessiWay
83
Google Analytics
87
Security
AccessiWay
80
Google Analytics
66
SEO
AccessiWay
84
Google Analytics
91
Composite
AccessiWay
78
Google Analytics
73

Google Analytics outperforms AccessiWay in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 78). AccessiWay leads in security, TTFB, composite score.

When to choose AccessiWay

Choose AccessiWay when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited AccessiWay sites and 2086 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AccessiWay or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, AccessiWay or Google Analytics?
AccessiWay sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AccessiWay or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AccessiWay or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AccessiWay or Google Analytics?
AccessiWay sites show lower Time to First Byte (151 ms vs 421 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AccessiWay or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while AccessiWay may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback