Based on 1 and 2366 real audits
| Metric | Acconsento.click | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 56 | 42 | Acconsento.click |
| Accessibility | 93 | 87 | Acconsento.click |
| Best Practices | 100 | 87 | Acconsento.click |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 77 | 67 | Acconsento.click |
| TTFB | 1684ms | 453ms | Google Analytics |
| Composite | 81 | 74 | Acconsento.click |
Acconsento.click outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 74). Google Analytics leads in TTFB.
Choose Acconsento.click when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Acconsento.click sites and 2366 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback