Skip to content

Ace vs Font Awesome

Based on 1 and 575 real audits

View Ace details | View Font Awesome details
MetricAceFont AwesomeWinner
Performance1844Font Awesome
Accessibility9787Ace
Best Practices10087Ace
SEO8391Font Awesome
Security7165Ace
TTFB167ms453msAce
Composite7073Font Awesome
Performance
Ace
18
Font Awesome
44
Accessibility
Ace
97
Font Awesome
87
Security
Ace
71
Font Awesome
65
SEO
Ace
83
Font Awesome
91
Composite
Ace
70
Font Awesome
73

Ace outperforms Font Awesome in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 73). Font Awesome leads in performance, SEO, composite score.

When to choose Ace

Choose Ace when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Ace sites and 575 audited Font Awesome sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Ace or Font Awesome?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 18 on average).
Which has better security, Ace or Font Awesome?
Ace sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Ace or Font Awesome?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Ace (97 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Ace or Font Awesome?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 83 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Ace or Font Awesome?
Ace sites show lower Time to First Byte (167 ms vs 453 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Ace or Font Awesome for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Ace may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback