| Metric | Ace | New Relic | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 18 | 35 | New Relic |
| Accessibility | 97 | 89 | Ace |
| Best Practices | 100 | 85 | Ace |
| SEO | 83 | 90 | New Relic |
| Security | 71 | 65 | Ace |
| TTFB | 167ms | 236ms | Ace |
| Composite | 70 | 72 | New Relic |
Ace outperforms New Relic in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 72). New Relic leads in performance, SEO, composite score.
Choose Ace when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose New Relic when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Ace sites and 177 audited New Relic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback