Based on 2 and 772 real audits
| Metric | Acquia Cloud Platform CDN | Amazon Web Services | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 38 | Acquia Cloud Platform CDN |
| Accessibility | 98 | 88 | Acquia Cloud Platform CDN |
| Best Practices | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| SEO | 96 | 91 | Acquia Cloud Platform CDN |
| Security | 68 | 65 | Acquia Cloud Platform CDN |
| TTFB | 605ms | 298ms | Amazon Web Services |
| Composite | 76 | 72 | Acquia Cloud Platform CDN |
Acquia Cloud Platform CDN outperforms Amazon Web Services in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in TTFB.
Choose Acquia Cloud Platform CDN when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Acquia Cloud Platform CDN sites and 772 audited Amazon Web Services sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback