Skip to content

Actirise vs AT Internet Analyzer

Based on 2 and 9 real audits

View Actirise details | View AT Internet Analyzer details
MetricActiriseAT Internet AnalyzerWinner
Performance5052AT Internet Analyzer
Accessibility7890AT Internet Analyzer
Best Practices8895AT Internet Analyzer
SEO9294AT Internet Analyzer
Security5765AT Internet Analyzer
TTFB149ms235msActirise
Composite7376AT Internet Analyzer
Performance
Actirise
50
AT Internet Analyzer
52
Accessibility
Actirise
78
AT Internet Analyzer
90
Security
Actirise
57
AT Internet Analyzer
65
SEO
Actirise
92
AT Internet Analyzer
94
Composite
Actirise
73
AT Internet Analyzer
76

AT Internet Analyzer outperforms Actirise in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Actirise leads in TTFB.

When to choose Actirise

Choose Actirise when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose AT Internet Analyzer

Choose AT Internet Analyzer when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Actirise sites and 9 audited AT Internet Analyzer sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Actirise or AT Internet Analyzer?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AT Internet Analyzer sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 50 on average).
Which has better security, Actirise or AT Internet Analyzer?
AT Internet Analyzer sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 57 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Actirise or AT Internet Analyzer?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AT Internet Analyzer (90 vs 78). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Actirise or AT Internet Analyzer?
AT Internet Analyzer sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Actirise or AT Internet Analyzer?
Actirise sites show lower Time to First Byte (149 ms vs 235 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Actirise or AT Internet Analyzer for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AT Internet Analyzer scores higher on overall composite score while Actirise may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback