Based on 2 and 1894 real audits
| Metric | Actirise | Cloudflare | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 47 | Actirise |
| Accessibility | 78 | 88 | Cloudflare |
| Best Practices | 88 | 86 | Actirise |
| SEO | 92 | 88 | Actirise |
| Security | 57 | 66 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 149ms | 270ms | Actirise |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Cloudflare |
Actirise outperforms Cloudflare in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Cloudflare leads in accessibility, security, composite score.
Choose Actirise when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Actirise sites and 1894 audited Cloudflare sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback