Skip to content

ActiveCampaign vs Broadstreet

Based on 3 and 1 real audits

View ActiveCampaign details | View Broadstreet details
MetricActiveCampaignBroadstreetWinner
Performance3549Broadstreet
Accessibility8281ActiveCampaign
Best Practices8681ActiveCampaign
SEO9292Tie
Security6662ActiveCampaign
TTFB228ms227msBroadstreet
Composite7474Tie
Performance
ActiveCampaign
35
Broadstreet
49
Accessibility
ActiveCampaign
82
Broadstreet
81
Security
ActiveCampaign
66
Broadstreet
62
SEO
ActiveCampaign
92
Broadstreet
92
Composite
ActiveCampaign
74
Broadstreet
74

ActiveCampaign outperforms Broadstreet in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Broadstreet leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose ActiveCampaign

Choose ActiveCampaign when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Broadstreet

Choose Broadstreet when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited ActiveCampaign sites and 1 audited Broadstreet sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, ActiveCampaign or Broadstreet?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Broadstreet sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, ActiveCampaign or Broadstreet?
ActiveCampaign sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ActiveCampaign or Broadstreet?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor ActiveCampaign (82 vs 81). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ActiveCampaign or Broadstreet?
ActiveCampaign sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ActiveCampaign or Broadstreet?
Broadstreet sites show lower Time to First Byte (227 ms vs 228 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ActiveCampaign or Broadstreet for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Broadstreet scores higher on overall composite score while ActiveCampaign may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback