Skip to content

ActiveCampaign vs core-js

Based on 3 and 1840 real audits

View ActiveCampaign details | View core-js details
MetricActiveCampaigncore-jsWinner
Performance3537core-js
Accessibility8288core-js
Best Practices8685ActiveCampaign
SEO9291ActiveCampaign
Security6667core-js
TTFB228ms439msActiveCampaign
Composite7474Tie
Performance
ActiveCampaign
35
core-js
37
Accessibility
ActiveCampaign
82
core-js
88
Security
ActiveCampaign
66
core-js
67
SEO
ActiveCampaign
92
core-js
91
Composite
ActiveCampaign
74
core-js
74

ActiveCampaign and core-js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. ActiveCampaign has a composite score of 74 while core-js scores 74.

When to choose ActiveCampaign

Choose ActiveCampaign when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited ActiveCampaign sites and 1840 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, ActiveCampaign or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, ActiveCampaign or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ActiveCampaign or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ActiveCampaign or core-js?
ActiveCampaign sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ActiveCampaign or core-js?
ActiveCampaign sites show lower Time to First Byte (228 ms vs 439 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ActiveCampaign or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while ActiveCampaign may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback