Skip to content

ActiveCampaign vs core-js

Based on 2 and 1599 real audits

View ActiveCampaign details | View core-js details
MetricActiveCampaigncore-jsWinner
Performance3836ActiveCampaign
Accessibility7988core-js
Best Practices7984core-js
SEO8891core-js
Security6165core-js
TTFB193ms379msActiveCampaign
Composite7172core-js
Performance
ActiveCampaign
38
core-js
36
Accessibility
ActiveCampaign
79
core-js
88
Security
ActiveCampaign
61
core-js
65
SEO
ActiveCampaign
88
core-js
91
Composite
ActiveCampaign
71
core-js
72

core-js outperforms ActiveCampaign in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). ActiveCampaign leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose ActiveCampaign

Choose ActiveCampaign when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited ActiveCampaign sites and 1599 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, ActiveCampaign or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, ActiveCampaign sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, ActiveCampaign or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ActiveCampaign or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 79). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ActiveCampaign or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ActiveCampaign or core-js?
ActiveCampaign sites show lower Time to First Byte (193 ms vs 379 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ActiveCampaign or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. ActiveCampaign scores higher on overall composite score while ActiveCampaign may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback