Based on 3 and 1 real audits
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | WP Courseware | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 30 | ActiveCampaign |
| Accessibility | 82 | 87 | WP Courseware |
| Best Practices | 86 | 100 | WP Courseware |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | WP Courseware |
| Security | 66 | 77 | WP Courseware |
| TTFB | 228ms | 297ms | ActiveCampaign |
| Composite | 74 | 81 | WP Courseware |
WP Courseware outperforms ActiveCampaign in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 74). ActiveCampaign leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose ActiveCampaign when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose WP Courseware when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited ActiveCampaign sites and 1 audited WP Courseware sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback