Skip to content

AD EBiS vs Matomo Analytics

Based on 1 and 136 real audits

View AD EBiS details | View Matomo Analytics details
MetricAD EBiSMatomo AnalyticsWinner
Performance4052Matomo Analytics
Accessibility9788AD EBiS
Best Practices7789Matomo Analytics
SEO10090AD EBiS
Security5865Matomo Analytics
TTFB1284ms428msMatomo Analytics
Composite6874Matomo Analytics
Performance
AD EBiS
40
Matomo Analytics
52
Accessibility
AD EBiS
97
Matomo Analytics
88
Security
AD EBiS
58
Matomo Analytics
65
SEO
AD EBiS
100
Matomo Analytics
90
Composite
AD EBiS
68
Matomo Analytics
74

Matomo Analytics outperforms AD EBiS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 68). AD EBiS leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose AD EBiS

Choose AD EBiS when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited AD EBiS sites and 136 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AD EBiS or Matomo Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, AD EBiS or Matomo Analytics?
Matomo Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 58 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AD EBiS or Matomo Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AD EBiS (97 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AD EBiS or Matomo Analytics?
AD EBiS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AD EBiS or Matomo Analytics?
Matomo Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (428 ms vs 1284 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AD EBiS or Matomo Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Matomo Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while AD EBiS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback