Based on 29 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Ad Lightning | Alexa Certified Site Metrics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 24 | 25 | Alexa Certified Site Metrics |
| Accessibility | 87 | 91 | Alexa Certified Site Metrics |
| Best Practices | 76 | 77 | Alexa Certified Site Metrics |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 67 | 69 | Alexa Certified Site Metrics |
| TTFB | 290ms | 1036ms | Ad Lightning |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Alexa Certified Site Metrics |
Alexa Certified Site Metrics outperforms Ad Lightning in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Ad Lightning leads in TTFB.
Choose Ad Lightning when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Alexa Certified Site Metrics when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 29 audited Ad Lightning sites and 1 audited Alexa Certified Site Metrics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback