| Metric | Ad Lightning | Po.st | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 24 | 25 | Po.st |
| Accessibility | 87 | 98 | Po.st |
| Best Practices | 76 | 73 | Ad Lightning |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | Po.st |
| Security | 67 | 59 | Ad Lightning |
| TTFB | 290ms | 289ms | Po.st |
| Composite | 72 | 70 | Ad Lightning |
Po.st outperforms Ad Lightning in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 72). Ad Lightning leads in best practices, security, composite score.
Choose Ad Lightning when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Po.st when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 29 audited Ad Lightning sites and 1 audited Po.st sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback