| Metric | Ada | Customily | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 28 | Ada |
| Accessibility | 92 | 96 | Customily |
| Best Practices | 81 | 81 | Tie |
| SEO | 87 | 100 | Customily |
| Security | 65 | 75 | Customily |
| TTFB | 113ms | 101ms | Customily |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Customily outperforms Ada in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Ada leads in performance.
Choose Ada when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Customily when your primary concern is SEO and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Ada sites and 1 audited Customily sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback