Skip to content

Adalyser vs Google Analytics

Based on 2 and 1936 real audits

View Adalyser details | View Google Analytics details
MetricAdalyserGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance2941Google Analytics
Accessibility9487Adalyser
Best Practices7585Google Analytics
SEO9691Adalyser
Security6465Google Analytics
TTFB43ms406msAdalyser
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Adalyser
29
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
Adalyser
94
Google Analytics
87
Security
Adalyser
64
Google Analytics
65
SEO
Adalyser
96
Google Analytics
91
Composite
Adalyser
73
Google Analytics
73

Adalyser and Google Analytics are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Adalyser has a composite score of 73 while Google Analytics scores 73.

When to choose Adalyser

Choose Adalyser when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Adalyser sites and 1936 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Adalyser or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, Adalyser or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Adalyser or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Adalyser (94 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Adalyser or Google Analytics?
Adalyser sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (96 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Adalyser or Google Analytics?
Adalyser sites show lower Time to First Byte (43 ms vs 406 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Adalyser or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Adalyser may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback