| Metric | AdBridg | AWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 26 | 39 | AWS |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | AdBridg |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | AWS |
| SEO | 97 | 91 | AdBridg |
| Security | 65 | 67 | AWS |
| TTFB | 78ms | 262ms | AdBridg |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
AdBridg and AWS are closely matched, each leading in different categories. AdBridg has a composite score of 73 while AWS scores 73.
Choose AdBridg when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose AWS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited AdBridg sites and 448 audited AWS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback