Based on 3 and 396 real audits
| Metric | AdBridg | AWS CloudFront | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 26 | 39 | AWS CloudFront |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | AdBridg |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | AWS CloudFront |
| SEO | 97 | 91 | AdBridg |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 78ms | 232ms | AdBridg |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | AdBridg |
AdBridg outperforms AWS CloudFront in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). AWS CloudFront leads in performance, best practices.
Choose AdBridg when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose AWS CloudFront when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited AdBridg sites and 396 audited AWS CloudFront sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback