Skip to content

Addsearch vs HSTS

Based on 3 and 2556 real audits

MetricAddsearchHSTSWinner
Performance3349HSTS
Accessibility8689HSTS
Best Practices9188Addsearch
SEO9291Addsearch
Security6670HSTS
TTFB1479ms364msHSTS
Composite7475HSTS
Performance
Addsearch
33
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Addsearch
86
HSTS
89
Security
Addsearch
66
HSTS
70
SEO
Addsearch
92
HSTS
91
Composite
Addsearch
74
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Addsearch in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Addsearch leads in best practices, SEO.

When to choose Addsearch

Choose Addsearch when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited Addsearch sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Addsearch or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Addsearch or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Addsearch or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Addsearch or HSTS?
Addsearch sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Addsearch or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 1479 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Addsearch or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Addsearch may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback