| Metric | AddToAny | Drupal | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 43 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 91 | 92 | Drupal |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 627ms | 446ms | Drupal |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Drupal outperforms AddToAny in 2 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). AddToAny leads in no categories.
AddToAny doesn't clearly lead Drupal in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Drupal when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 46 audited AddToAny sites and 382 audited Drupal sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback