Skip to content

AddToAny vs Google Analytics

Based on 40 and 2004 real audits

View AddToAny details | View Google Analytics details
MetricAddToAnyGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance4041Google Analytics
Accessibility9187AddToAny
Best Practices8886AddToAny
SEO9191Tie
Security6465Google Analytics
TTFB319ms413msAddToAny
Composite7373Tie
Performance
AddToAny
40
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
AddToAny
91
Google Analytics
87
Security
AddToAny
64
Google Analytics
65
SEO
AddToAny
91
Google Analytics
91
Composite
AddToAny
73
Google Analytics
73

AddToAny outperforms Google Analytics in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in performance, security.

When to choose AddToAny

Choose AddToAny when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 40 audited AddToAny sites and 2004 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AddToAny or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, AddToAny or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AddToAny or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AddToAny (91 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AddToAny or Google Analytics?
AddToAny sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AddToAny or Google Analytics?
AddToAny sites show lower Time to First Byte (319 ms vs 413 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AddToAny or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while AddToAny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback