Skip to content

AddToAny vs Google Analytics

Based on 41 and 2160 real audits

View AddToAny details | View Google Analytics details
MetricAddToAnyGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance4242Tie
Accessibility9187AddToAny
Best Practices8786AddToAny
SEO9191Tie
Security6566Google Analytics
TTFB313ms434msAddToAny
Composite7374Google Analytics
Performance
AddToAny
42
Google Analytics
42
Accessibility
AddToAny
91
Google Analytics
87
Security
AddToAny
65
Google Analytics
66
SEO
AddToAny
91
Google Analytics
91
Composite
AddToAny
73
Google Analytics
74

AddToAny outperforms Google Analytics in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Google Analytics leads in security, composite score.

When to choose AddToAny

Choose AddToAny when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 41 audited AddToAny sites and 2160 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AddToAny or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AddToAny sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, AddToAny or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AddToAny or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AddToAny (91 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AddToAny or Google Analytics?
AddToAny sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AddToAny or Google Analytics?
AddToAny sites show lower Time to First Byte (313 ms vs 434 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AddToAny or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AddToAny scores higher on overall composite score while AddToAny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback