Skip to content

AddToAny vs Infolinks

Based on 40 and 1 real audits

View AddToAny details | View Infolinks details
MetricAddToAnyInfolinksWinner
Performance4095Infolinks
Accessibility9191Tie
Best Practices88100Infolinks
SEO91100Infolinks
Security6461AddToAny
TTFB319ms367msAddToAny
Composite7374Infolinks
Performance
AddToAny
40
Infolinks
95
Accessibility
AddToAny
91
Infolinks
91
Security
AddToAny
64
Infolinks
61
SEO
AddToAny
91
Infolinks
100
Composite
AddToAny
73
Infolinks
74

Infolinks outperforms AddToAny in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). AddToAny leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose AddToAny

Choose AddToAny when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Infolinks

Choose Infolinks when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 40 audited AddToAny sites and 1 audited Infolinks sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AddToAny or Infolinks?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Infolinks sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (95 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, AddToAny or Infolinks?
AddToAny sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AddToAny or Infolinks?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AddToAny (91 vs 91). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AddToAny or Infolinks?
Infolinks sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AddToAny or Infolinks?
AddToAny sites show lower Time to First Byte (319 ms vs 367 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AddToAny or Infolinks for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Infolinks scores higher on overall composite score while AddToAny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback