Skip to content

AddToAny vs jQuery

Based on 40 and 1857 real audits

View AddToAny details | View jQuery details
MetricAddToAnyjQueryWinner
Performance4045jQuery
Accessibility9186AddToAny
Best Practices8887AddToAny
SEO9190AddToAny
Security6465jQuery
TTFB319ms438msAddToAny
Composite7373Tie
Performance
AddToAny
40
jQuery
45
Accessibility
AddToAny
91
jQuery
86
Security
AddToAny
64
jQuery
65
SEO
AddToAny
91
jQuery
90
Composite
AddToAny
73
jQuery
73

AddToAny outperforms jQuery in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). jQuery leads in performance, security.

When to choose AddToAny

Choose AddToAny when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose jQuery

Choose jQuery when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 40 audited AddToAny sites and 1857 audited jQuery sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AddToAny or jQuery?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, jQuery sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, AddToAny or jQuery?
jQuery sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AddToAny or jQuery?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AddToAny (91 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AddToAny or jQuery?
AddToAny sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AddToAny or jQuery?
AddToAny sites show lower Time to First Byte (319 ms vs 438 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AddToAny or jQuery for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. jQuery scores higher on overall composite score while AddToAny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback