Skip to content

AddToAny vs Microsoft

Based on 40 and 2421 real audits

View AddToAny details | View Microsoft details
MetricAddToAnyMicrosoftWinner
Performance4039AddToAny
Accessibility9189AddToAny
Best Practices8886AddToAny
SEO9189AddToAny
Security6466Microsoft
TTFB319ms329msAddToAny
Composite7372AddToAny
Performance
AddToAny
40
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
AddToAny
91
Microsoft
89
Security
AddToAny
64
Microsoft
66
SEO
AddToAny
91
Microsoft
89
Composite
AddToAny
73
Microsoft
72

AddToAny outperforms Microsoft in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Microsoft leads in security.

When to choose AddToAny

Choose AddToAny when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 40 audited AddToAny sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AddToAny or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AddToAny sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, AddToAny or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AddToAny or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AddToAny (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AddToAny or Microsoft?
AddToAny sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AddToAny or Microsoft?
AddToAny sites show lower Time to First Byte (319 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AddToAny or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AddToAny scores higher on overall composite score while AddToAny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback