Skip to content

ADFOX vs DDoS-Guard

Based on 26 and 9 real audits

View ADFOX details | View DDoS-Guard details
MetricADFOXDDoS-GuardWinner
Performance3844DDoS-Guard
Accessibility7176DDoS-Guard
Best Practices8694DDoS-Guard
SEO8990DDoS-Guard
Security6365DDoS-Guard
TTFB380ms524msADFOX
Composite7071DDoS-Guard
Performance
ADFOX
38
DDoS-Guard
44
Accessibility
ADFOX
71
DDoS-Guard
76
Security
ADFOX
63
DDoS-Guard
65
SEO
ADFOX
89
DDoS-Guard
90
Composite
ADFOX
70
DDoS-Guard
71

DDoS-Guard outperforms ADFOX in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). ADFOX leads in TTFB.

When to choose ADFOX

Choose ADFOX when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose DDoS-Guard

Choose DDoS-Guard when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 26 audited ADFOX sites and 9 audited DDoS-Guard sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, ADFOX or DDoS-Guard?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DDoS-Guard sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, ADFOX or DDoS-Guard?
DDoS-Guard sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ADFOX or DDoS-Guard?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DDoS-Guard (76 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ADFOX or DDoS-Guard?
DDoS-Guard sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ADFOX or DDoS-Guard?
ADFOX sites show lower Time to First Byte (380 ms vs 524 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ADFOX or DDoS-Guard for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DDoS-Guard scores higher on overall composite score while ADFOX may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback