Skip to content

ADFOX vs DDoS-Guard

Based on 27 and 10 real audits

View ADFOX details | View DDoS-Guard details
MetricADFOXDDoS-GuardWinner
Performance3740DDoS-Guard
Accessibility7175DDoS-Guard
Best Practices8691DDoS-Guard
SEO8989Tie
Security6366DDoS-Guard
TTFB383ms509msADFOX
Composite7071DDoS-Guard
Performance
ADFOX
37
DDoS-Guard
40
Accessibility
ADFOX
71
DDoS-Guard
75
Security
ADFOX
63
DDoS-Guard
66
SEO
ADFOX
89
DDoS-Guard
89
Composite
ADFOX
70
DDoS-Guard
71

DDoS-Guard outperforms ADFOX in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). ADFOX leads in TTFB.

When to choose ADFOX

Choose ADFOX when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose DDoS-Guard

Choose DDoS-Guard when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 27 audited ADFOX sites and 10 audited DDoS-Guard sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, ADFOX or DDoS-Guard?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DDoS-Guard sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, ADFOX or DDoS-Guard?
DDoS-Guard sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ADFOX or DDoS-Guard?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DDoS-Guard (75 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ADFOX or DDoS-Guard?
ADFOX sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ADFOX or DDoS-Guard?
ADFOX sites show lower Time to First Byte (383 ms vs 509 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ADFOX or DDoS-Guard for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DDoS-Guard scores higher on overall composite score while ADFOX may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback