| Metric | ADFOX | Liveinternet | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 36 | ADFOX |
| Accessibility | 71 | 83 | Liveinternet |
| Best Practices | 86 | 88 | Liveinternet |
| SEO | 89 | 97 | Liveinternet |
| Security | 63 | 64 | Liveinternet |
| TTFB | 380ms | 333ms | Liveinternet |
| Composite | 70 | 71 | Liveinternet |
Liveinternet outperforms ADFOX in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). ADFOX leads in performance.
Choose ADFOX when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Liveinternet when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 26 audited ADFOX sites and 3 audited Liveinternet sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback