Skip to content

ADFOX vs Yandex.Direct

Based on 27 and 1 real audits

View ADFOX details | View Yandex.Direct details
MetricADFOXYandex.DirectWinner
Performance3746Yandex.Direct
Accessibility7146ADFOX
Best Practices8677ADFOX
SEO8983ADFOX
Security6365Yandex.Direct
TTFB383ms311msYandex.Direct
Composite7072Yandex.Direct
Performance
ADFOX
37
Yandex.Direct
46
Accessibility
ADFOX
71
Yandex.Direct
46
Security
ADFOX
63
Yandex.Direct
65
SEO
ADFOX
89
Yandex.Direct
83
Composite
ADFOX
70
Yandex.Direct
72

Yandex.Direct outperforms ADFOX in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). ADFOX leads in accessibility, best practices, SEO.

When to choose ADFOX

Choose ADFOX when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Yandex.Direct

Choose Yandex.Direct when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 27 audited ADFOX sites and 1 audited Yandex.Direct sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, ADFOX or Yandex.Direct?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Yandex.Direct sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, ADFOX or Yandex.Direct?
Yandex.Direct sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ADFOX or Yandex.Direct?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor ADFOX (71 vs 46). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ADFOX or Yandex.Direct?
ADFOX sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 83 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ADFOX or Yandex.Direct?
Yandex.Direct sites show lower Time to First Byte (311 ms vs 383 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ADFOX or Yandex.Direct for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Yandex.Direct scores higher on overall composite score while ADFOX may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback