Based on 26 and 47 real audits
| Metric | ADFOX | Yandex.Metrika | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 45 | Yandex.Metrika |
| Accessibility | 71 | 72 | Yandex.Metrika |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | Yandex.Metrika |
| SEO | 89 | 90 | Yandex.Metrika |
| Security | 63 | 63 | Tie |
| TTFB | 380ms | 390ms | ADFOX |
| Composite | 70 | 71 | Yandex.Metrika |
Yandex.Metrika outperforms ADFOX in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). ADFOX leads in TTFB.
Choose ADFOX when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yandex.Metrika when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 26 audited ADFOX sites and 47 audited Yandex.Metrika sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback