| Metric | Adjust | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 37 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 85 | 88 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | Adjust |
| SEO | 88 | 91 | core-js |
| Security | 64 | 66 | core-js |
| TTFB | 400ms | 424ms | Adjust |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
core-js outperforms Adjust in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Adjust leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose Adjust when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 20 audited Adjust sites and 1747 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback