Skip to content

Adjust vs HSTS

Based on 20 and 2556 real audits

View Adjust details | View HSTS details
MetricAdjustHSTSWinner
Performance3649HSTS
Accessibility8589HSTS
Best Practices8788HSTS
SEO8891HSTS
Security6470HSTS
TTFB400ms364msHSTS
Composite7375HSTS
Performance
Adjust
36
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Adjust
85
HSTS
89
Security
Adjust
64
HSTS
70
SEO
Adjust
88
HSTS
91
Composite
Adjust
73
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Adjust in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Adjust leads in no categories.

When to choose Adjust

Adjust doesn't clearly lead HSTS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 20 audited Adjust sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Adjust or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Adjust or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Adjust or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Adjust or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Adjust or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 400 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Adjust or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Adjust may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback