| Metric | Adjust | Microsoft | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 39 | Microsoft |
| Accessibility | 85 | 89 | Microsoft |
| Best Practices | 87 | 86 | Adjust |
| SEO | 88 | 89 | Microsoft |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Microsoft |
| TTFB | 400ms | 329ms | Microsoft |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Adjust |
Microsoft outperforms Adjust in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Adjust leads in best practices, composite score.
Choose Adjust when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 20 audited Adjust sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback